Chondral defects refer to focal lesions or damage in the articular cartilage, which are difficult to treat. If left untreated, these abnormalities can lead to an increased risk of osteoarthritis (OA), a primary chronic joint disease caused by various factors. The worldwide prevalence of OA is estimated to be around 250 million people. This painful condition is characterized by symptoms such as stiffness, muscle loss, fatigue, insomnia, stress, depression, stigmatization, and a decline in quality of life (1). In the field of orthopaedics, several treatment options have been developed to manage these anomalies. Osteoarticular transplants have emerged as the first and most common procedure, followed by the gold standard microfracture procedure that has been widely used for nearly 30 years. In the late 1990s, the implantation of autologous chondrocytes was introduced as an alternative treatment. Scaffold-based techniques entered the scene in the early 2000s (2). While these therapies offer advantages, they also come with drawbacks such as the need for open surgery, primary chondrocyte dedifferentiation, a lengthy recovery period, and morbidity at the donor site. As a result, the treatment of cartilage abnormalities remains challenging. However, there is hope in contemporary cell-based therapy utilizing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This approach has significant implications, such as immunological rejection and tumorigenicity. Another promising alternative to cell-based therapy is exosome-based cell-free therapy (3).
Exosomes, the smallest vesicles ranging from 30 to 150 nm in diameter, are released from cells and play a crucial role in cell-to-cell communication. These vesicles carry a cargo of proteins, mRNA, DNA, RNA, and lipids, and recent evidence suggests that they are nature’s delivery system. Exosomes are produced by endosomes and can be released by cells in both physiological and pathological conditions. Research has shown the involvement of exosomes in cartilage-associated defects (4). Exosomes derived from OA joints have been found to carry pathogenic signals, including proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-22. These cytokines are believed to contribute to the degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) by attracting matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (5). Exosomes derived from primary chondrocytes, when combined with hydrogels, have shown successful outcomes in chondral healing by delivering sustained release of exosomes to the target location and enhancing chondrocyte proliferation, migration, and matrix production (6). In addition, exosome therapy has been shown to promote the formation of hyaline cartilage by injecting exosomes directly into the affected joint. This treatment has been found to significantly regenerate cartilage lesions in a model of osteochondral defects (7).
This review article delves into the potential of exosomes in treating disorders associated with cartilage, with a particular focus on OA. The article provides an overview of exosomes and their role in intercellular communication, followed by a discussion of their use in diverse ailments, core focus on OA. It also explores the mechanism of action of exosomes with native cells and their clinical applications. Furthermore, the article provides updates on clinical trials involving exosomes for different conditions. Lastly, the article concludes with a comprehensive discussion on the utilization of exosomes in the context of OA.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a crucial role in cell-cell communication, migration, and various biological processes. Cells release EVs in both normal and pathological conditions, including exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies predominantly (Fig. 1). However, recent studies have also identified other types of EVs such as migrasomes, exophers, exomeres, supremeres, chromatimeres, lipoproteins, oncosomes, and others. Each type of vesicle has its distinct origin and function (Table 1). The nomenclature of vesicles has previously puzzled researchers since all vesicles are secreted by cells. EVs carry a cargo of proteins, mRNA, lipids, and DNA (8). They can be classified based on their sedimentation properties and composition. On average, EVs have a sedimentation rate ranging from 1.10 to 1.30 g/ml. Exosomes are characterized by specific markers such as CD63, CD9, CD81, Alix, and Tsg101. Microvesicles, on the other hand, are distinguished by the presence of selectins and integrins, while apoptotic bodies contain histones and DNA. In terms of lipid content, microvesicles have an exposed phosphatidylserine, whereas exosomes have an exposure. The roles in biological activities encompass waste disposal, protein and RNA transfer for functionality, and intercellular communication. Each extracellular vesicle has distinct molecular features due to its specific biogenesis mechanism. Exosomes represent a subgroup of EVs, typically measuring 30∼150 nm in diameter and having a density of 1.13∼1.19 g/ml. Exosomes serve as disease indicators, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets. They possess the ability to directly target cells, regulate the microenvironment and inflammation, and promote tissue regeneration. In both normal and pathological situations, they play a crucial role by facilitating cell-to-cell communication. Exosomes were initially discovered in the 1980s as endocytic microvesicles released by maturing reticulocytes by Pan and Johnstone. While Trams’ publication was frequently referenced during the 1980s, the term “exosome” did not resurface to refer to EVs until 1986 and again in 1987, coined by Rose Johnstone. Although the name “exosome” for these EVs was later adopted by Rose Johnstone, the term had been previously used to describe other membrane fragments isolated from biological fluids. Exosomes were initially regarded as cellular “trash bags,” but it wasn’t until the mid-1990s that their vital roles in intercellular communication in normal physiological processes and disease pathogenesis, including cancer, were gradually revealed (9). Nearly all cells release exosomes, with their biogenesis commencing at the cell surface.
Table 1 . Hallmarks of extracellular vesicles
Characteristics | Exosomes | Microvesicles | Apoptotic bodies | Exophers | Migrasomes | Exomeres | Supremeres | Chromatimeres | Lipoproteins | Oncosomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size | 30∼150 nm | 100∼1,000 nm | 0.5∼5,000 nm | 3.5∼4 μm | <4 μm | ≤50 nm | N/A | N/A | ∼30 to 150 nm HDL (5∼15 nm) | 1∼100 μm |
Shape | Spherical/cup shaped | Irregular | Irregular | Irregularly shaped but are typically spherical structures | Oval shaped | N/A | N/A | N/A | Lipoprotein-like structures, micelle-like structures | Cup-shaped vesicles |
Density | 1.13∼1.19 g/ml | 1.25∼1.30 g/ml | 1.16∼1.28 g/ml | N/A | N/A | Lower density | Vary depending on their buoyant density | N/A | 0.930∼1.210 g/ml | Discrete buoyant densities |
Sedimentation rate | 100,000∼200,000 | 10,000∼20,000 | 1,200, 10,000, or 100,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Origin | Multivesicular bodies (endocytic pathway) | Plasma membrane | Various cell types | Evagination of the cell membrane | Tetraspanin- enriched macrodomain accumulation | N/A | N/A | N/A | Synthesized primarily in the liver | Cancer cells |
Mechanism of release | Exocytosis (MVBs) (inward budding) | Outward budding of plasma membrane | Cell death causes cell shrinkage and blebbing of the plasma membrane | Pinching-off mechanism | Released from the retraction fibers during cell migration | N/A | N/A | N/A | Endogenous lipoprotein pathway | Shedding of plasma membrane blebs |
Content | mRNA, miRNA, proteins, lipids | mRNA, miRNA, proteins, lipids | Proteins, nuclear segments, DNA, RNA, lipid cellular debris | Organelles, large protein complexes, aggregated, soluble proteins, and other cytoplasmic components | mRNA, protein, or damaged mitochondria, or as chemoattractive sources | Proteins, nucleic acids and lipids | N/A | DNA | Cholesterol | Distinct protein cargo, tumor DNA |
Biomarkers | Exosomal markers- ALIX, TSG101, HSC70, CD63, CD9, CD81, and HSP90 | Selectins, integrins, CD40 | Histones, HSP60, GRP78 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Apolipoprotein B, sphingolipids/ ceramides | Cancer-specific biomarkers |
Lipid composition | Cholesterol, sphingomyelin and ceramide-rich lipid rafts, low phosphatidylserine exposure | High phosphatidylserine exposure, cholesterol | N/A | Unknown lipid bilayer composition | N/A | Lipid bilayer membrane | N/A | N/A | Saturated and monoenoic fatty acids | N/A |
Biological purpose | Cell-to-cell communication, migration, and maintenance, as well as a payload of proteins, DNA, and RNAs that imitate the parent cell | Role in intercellular communication | Efficient removal of cell debris | Related to autophagy | Cell migration | Intercellular communication | Large protein complexes, including ribosomes and proteasomes | Complex of DNA and proteins | Transport of lipids, immunomodulation | Oncogenic transformation, intercellular communication |
Pathway | ESCRT- dependent and ESCRT– independent, constitutive dependent, stimuli dependent | Constitutive dependent, stimuli dependent Ca2 dependent | Apoptosis dependent | Ubiquitin- proteasome system and autophagy- lysosome pathway | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Exogenous and endogenous lipoprotein pathway | AKT1 and EGFR pathway, c-MET pathway |
Quantification | DLS Nanoparticle tracking analysis TEM, SEM | N/A | N/A | No standard methodologies | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | FRET-based assay, tunable resistive pulse sensing, flow cytometry | FRET-based assay, DLS |
Isolation methods | Ultracentrifugation Size exclusion chromatography Tangential flow filtration EXO-Kit methods | No standard methodologies | Ultracentrifugation | No standard methodologies | N/A | Ultracentrifugation and asymmetric- flow field-flow fractionation | Ultracentri-fugation, density gradient centrifugation | N/A | Ultracentrifugation, size exclusion chromatography | Physicochemical methods, ultracentrifugation |
N/A: not available, HDL: high density lipoprotein, MVBs: multi-vesicular bodies, ESCRT: endosomal sorting complex required for transport, DLS: dynamic light scattering.
Biogenesis of exosomes: Exosomes are membrane-bound endosomes-derived vesicles that begin with a twofold invagination of the plasma membrane. Later on, the cargoes enter, forming multi-vesicular bodies (MVBs). Intraluminal vesicles are exosome precursors formed by inward budding of MVBs (8). The biogenesis and release of exosomes are regulated by various factors, such as endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), which consist of ESCRT proteins (ESCRT-0, I, II, and III) and accessory proteins like ALIX, vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 4, Rab GTPase activating protein, sphingomyelinase, and ceramide. Additionally, mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) regulates exosome release in response to changes in nutritional and growth factor conditions, and that mTORC1 activation limits exosome release in cultured cells and
Isolation of exosomes: Exosomes can be isolated using ultracentrifugation, size exclusion chromatography, tangential flow filtration, coprecipitation, and immunoaffinity techniques. However, ultracentrifugation is time-consuming and results in a relatively low exosome yield. Instead, chromatography-based approaches have been adopted to isolate exosomes based on size. Gel selection is essential for exosome isolation, as denser compounds have short pathways in the gel, while smaller vesicles have a long retention period. Exosomes were created in a conditioned medium with tangential flow filtration to size fractionate the medium. Tangential flow filtration was used to create exosomes in a conditioned medium, ensuring effective ultra-centrifugation. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) were extracted using size exclusion chromatography. During low-speed centrifugation, polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrophilic polymers interacted with exosomes, reducing their solubility and precipitating them (11). Researchers have also developed novel methods for isolating exosomes using affinity capture with antibodies. Filipović et al. (12), used single domain antibodies that had been chosen from the naive library and confirmed to have exosome stabilizing properties. However, binding to the targets was complicated due to specialized antibodies. This approach effectively isolated vesicles with exosome-like morphology and biochemistry. Exosomes have been found to play a crucial role in intercellular communication and hold promise for ther-
apeutic applications in disorders such as cancer, inflammation, and neurological diseases. Immunoaffinity interactions provide an intriguing method for exosome separation, although it is a laborious and costly process. How-ever, there is no single optimal method for exosome isolation, and an inclusive approach using multiple techniques may create the best results. Following the Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles guidelines of 2018, specificity and recovery are the main variables of each isolation technique (13).
Characterization of exosomes: Identification of exosomes after isolation is crucial for understanding their properties. Various methods, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), western blot, and flow cytometry, can be used for this purpose. TEM is commonly employed to identify and characterize a single exosome, as it reveals the typical cup-shaped structure. SEM utilizes the collection of ejected electrons to produce images. NTA, on the other hand, is a light scattering technique that provides information about the size distribution of EVs. Western blotting is a frequently used analysis method due to its simplicity and wide availability in exosome research. Additionally, flow cytometry is another preferred technique for exosome counting, as it can identify exosomes and count particles larger than 500 nm (14). Considering the growing interest in exosome research, it is crucial to have a comprehensive article that highlights the different methods for their isolation and detection. Overall, characterizing exosomes is vital for understanding their properties and exploring potential therapeutic applications.
Exosomes from the injured region exacerbate damage, while therapeutic cells preserve equilibrium. Exosomes could be extracted from a variety of cell origins; this section will review exosomes from various parent cells and their involvement in regeneration. Exosomes from MSC can enhance cartilage and subchondral bone healing. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) derived exosomes enhance the immunological microenvironment by healing IL-1β damaged chondrocytes. Chen et al. (15), examined into the ability of BMSC-derived exosomes to repair mitochondrial malfunction and oxidative stress in degenerative cartilage. Exosomes generated from human adipose derived stem cell (hADSC) isolated miR375-overexpressing exosomes displayed enhanced osteogenic capacity in human BMSC-target cells
Table 2 . Origin and isolation techniques of exosomes
Exosome cell type/origin | Exosome isolation procedure | Method (advantages/disadvantages) | Effects/characteristics | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
BMSC-EXOs | Ultracentrifugation (100,000 | Gold standard method for exosome isolation/time-consuming and requires expensive equipment | Repair mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in degenerative cartilage supplemented with mitochondrial proteins | (10) |
Chondrocytes | Ultracentrifugation (100,000 | Induce chondrocyte proliferation and migration, enhance matrix synthesis. Regulation of macrophage | (13) | |
UMSC | Ultracentrifugation (110,000 | Promote chondral damage repair by upregulating lncRNA H19 in response to mechanical stimulation | (14) | |
BMSC-EXOs | Ultracentrifugation (100,000 | Regulate the equilibrium by aiding the healing of IL-1β-damaged chondrocytes | (29) | |
Human-WJMSC | Size exclusion chromatography | High specificity and purity of exosome population/ low yield of exosomes | Transmit particular miRNAs that preserve cartilage homeostasis by stimulating chondrocyte proliferation, migration, catabolic activity, and M2 infiltration | (12) |
Human embryonic stem cells E1-MYC 16.3 | Tangential flow filtration | Separates exosomes by size and density/time-consuming and requires expensive equipment | Protect the OA joint from damage by promoting cartilage repair, inhibitingsynovitis, and mediating subchondral bone remodeling | (15) |
BMSC-EXOs: bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes, UMSC: umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cell, WJMSC: Wharton jelly derived mesenchymal stem cell, lncRNA: long noncoding RNA, IL: interleukin, OA: osteoarthritis.
Exosomes have been affiliated to the development of metabolic diseases and major health problems. Exosomes produced by cancer cells change cell metabolism and act as a potent biomarker. LINC00161, a member of the lncRNA family, was shown to be highly expressed in the serum and exosomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients (21). Several clinical trials, one of which is NCT03830619, have been conducted to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of serum exosome (sEXO) non-coding RNA as a biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis. miR-532-5p, which is connected to cancer risk factors, perhaps used as a biomarker in urological malignancies to distinguish biochemical recurrence and metastasis (22). The combined use of exosomes carried by exogenous MSCs and endogenous gene modification can provide new ideas for the treatment of tumors. Qiu et al. (23), drugs for the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma (cabazitaxel, CTX) were incubated with TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) gene-modified MSCs, and exosomes loaded with CTX/TRAIL were successfully purified (MSCT-EXO/CTX). Subsequently, the anticancer effect of MSCT-EXO/CTX was successfully verified
Exosomes are vital to cell communication because they suppress catabolic factors like MMPs and inflammatory cytokines while boosting anti-inflammatory cytokines, transforming growth factors (TGFs), and other anabolic fac-tors. Exosomes from afflicted locations, such as synovial fluid (SF), OA joints has the reverse impact of healthy exosomes in that they hindered repair enhancement while increasing damage and negative influence in gene expre-ssion. According to a study, healthy chondrocytes were treated with OA-derived exosomes revealed a reduction in the production of anti-inflammatory and anabolic markers. In addition, proinflammatory (M1) macrophages were strongly stimulated by SF-derived exosomes in the release of various inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and MMPs, but not in the expression of CD80 and CD86 co-stimulatory markers. Furthermore, this study found that SF-derived exosomes enhanced osteoclastogenesis in the absence of macrophage colony stimulating factor as well as receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) ligand (28). In a study, osteoarthritic subchondral bone exosomes activated catabolic genes and decreased chondrocyte specific marker expression. Using RNA sequencing and miRNA profiling, they discovered that miR-210-p was responsible for catabolic gene expression. They were able to suppress miR-210-p using its inhibitor and diminish catabolic gene expression in the OA (29). The elevated expression inflammatory agents eventually target the ECM degrading various types of collagens, proteoglycans (PGs), and other matrix components. Albumin is the most prevalent protein in human blood and a significant component of SF. Albumin content diminishes as the osteochondral defect progresses. Albumin has been reported to have anti-inflammatory characteristics and to upregulate collagen expression during chondrogenic differentiation, which has an impact on the treatment of OA. These findings are still tentative, therefore extensive study into molecular analysis and the mechanism underlying the interaction between exosomes and recipient cells is anticipated.
Exosomes are resistant to degradation, and present in various biofluids, such as blood, SF, and urine, moreover, these characteristics that make them attractive biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of OA. Studies have shown that the content of exosomes in biofluids changes during the progression of OA. These changes include increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, and elevated levels of MMPs, break down the ECM. Furthermore, exosomal lncRNAs PCGEM1 that help in the regulation of gene expression and can be used to identify different stages of OA (30). The identification of novel non-invasive biomarkers to inform early diagnosis and disease progno-sis, support personalized treatment selection, and monitor therapeutic progression is of high priority. These biomar-kers can assist medical professionals in making qualified decisions regarding treatment options and fine-tune them as needed to get the best possible outcomes for the patient.
The field of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is rapidly advancing and is widely used for creating tissues and organs. There are three major category of 3D bioprinting based on the technology used: laser-based, inkjet-based, and extrusion-based. Stereolithography is a popular laser-based technology for creating scaffolds with high resolution. Decellularized porcine cartilage ECM is combined with stereolithography to produce a homogeneous bulk distribution of exosomes, which may alleviate chondrocyte mitochondrial dysfunction, promote chondrocyte migration, and trigger M2 macrophage polarization (15). Inkjet bioprinting is a non-contact technique that deposits ink droplets layer by layer and is categorized into piezoelectric and thermal deposition. Inkjet bioprinting was integrated with melt electro writing scaffolds in a recent study (31). Exosomes derived from MSCs have been shown to enhance tissue regeneration and repair in various studies. These exosomes can be incorporated into inkjet bioprinting to enhance the regenerative potential of the printed tissues (32). Extrusion-based bioprinting is a low-cost and convenient method that allows printing of viscous bioinks. On the other hand, the pressure used can result in high shear stress on cells and reduced cell viability. Latest investigation used methacrylated HA hydrogel bioink to 3D print a patch that was effectively infiltrated by human MSCs exosomes, displaying better mechanical performance and high printability. This study demonstrates the potential of exosome-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. This technique has shown outstanding proliferation, migration, and gene expression in fibroblasts and endothelial cells and has been found to be an effective wound healing strategy (33). As revealed by a recent study, exosomes were combined with 3D-printed SF/COL-I/nHA scaffolds to create an elaborate cell-free bone-tissue-engineering system. The scaffolds were lyophilized, crosslinked, sterilized, and retained at −20℃ after being lyophilized and crosslinked. After that, exosomes were inserted into the scaffolds and their release profiles were investigated. The findings revealed that the exosome-loaded scaffolds stimulated angiogenesis and alveolar bone defect healing (34). Similarly, researchers applied 3D printing to construct porous scaffolds and loaded them with bioceramic-induced macrophage exosomes. The results showed that the exosome-loaded scaffolds had immunomodulatory effects and promoted osteogenesis and angiogenesis (35). Likewise, researchers developed a “cell-free scaffold engineering” strategy that integrates strontium and highly bioactive sEXOs inside a 3D-printed scaffold. The results showed that the sEXO-loaded scaffolds had enhanced osteogenesis and angiogenesis, making them a promising approach for critical bone defects (36). Recently, researchers developed a novel bioinspired double-network hydrogel scaffold produced via 3D printing with tissue-specific decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) and exosomes. The results showed that the exosome-reinforced hydrogel scaffolds had efficient cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration (37). Overall, the use of exosomes in 3D bioprinting is a promising area of research that holds great potential for the development of novel therapeutic approaches for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
In the field of bioprinting, natural biomaterials such as hyaluronate, gelatin, collagen, alginate, and dECM, or synthetically produced polymer composites like polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, polycaprolactone, and poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) are commonly used. Inorganic components such as graphene, β-tricalcium phosphate, and nanoparticles are coupled with scaffolds to enhance their mechanical properties. Hydrogels are capable of absorbing water and entrapping necessary components, are currently being applied in tissue regeneration owing to their high-water content, crosslinking processes, and ability to function as a 3D hydrophilic polymer matrix. Hydrogels made of natural biopolymers like alginate, chitosan, gelatin, and HA, as well as synthetic biopolymers such as PEG, PLGA, and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Exosomes, when combined with biomaterials, hold great potential for the development of novel therapeutic approaches for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent studies have shown that exosome-laden injectable hydrogels can improve diabetic wound healing, promote macrophage polarization, and accelerate angiogenesis. Xing et al. (38), created an injectable thermosensitive hydrogel using ADSC generated exosomes and dECM hydrogel. Furthermore, synthetic poly(D,L-lactide)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(D,L-lactide) triblock copolymer gels have demonstrated potential for cartilage preservation and slowing the advancement of OA. On the other hand, hydrogel was prepared by combining exosomes with polymers and crosslinkers for gelation. The study found that the GMOCS hydrogel significantly promoted the synthesis of ECM due to the doping of OCS. Additionally, the combination of BMSC-derived exosomes with a hydrogel scaffold can improve its bioactivity, which can help human umbilical vein endothelial cells grow (39). In a study, fabricated GelMA/nano clay/sEVs hydrogel was crosslinked with ultraviolet light and Laponite nano clay was added to improve the biological and mechanical properties and to release sEVs in a sustained manner with hydrogel degradation (40). On the other hand, PLGA–PEG–PLGA thermogel combined with kartogenin was used as an intraarticular injection and was shown to improve cartilage repair in an anterior cruciate ligament transection surgery-induced OA model (41). According to recent research, sEVs produced from synovial mesenchymal stem cells can enhance chondrocyte proliferation and migration. circRNA3503-OE-sEVs alleviated inflammation-induced apoptosis and the imbalance between ECM synthesis and ECM degradation by acting as a sponge for I-miR-181c-3p and hsa-let-7b-3p and was considerably elevated following melatonin-induced cell sleep. The researchers looked at the viability of using sEVs in conjunction with sleep-related circRNA3503 as a targeted therapeutic agent using injectable thermosensitive hydrogel to prevent OA. PDLLA-PEG-PDLLA; PLEL triblock copolymer-based gels were applied in the investigation, which gradually released circRNA3503-loaded sEVs. The researchers discovered that circRNA3503-OE-sEVs diminished inflammation-induced apoptosis and the imbalance between ECM production and degradation via numerous paths as a result, that sEVs and circRNA3503 have the potential to be used as a targeted treatment agent with injectable thermosensitive hydrogel to prevent OA development (42). Additionally, AD/CS/RSF hydrogel has been found to promote BMSC migration, proliferation, and differentiation in cartilage defect regeneration and remodelling of the ECM. In animal models of cartilage damage, the AD/CS/RSF/EXO hydrogel with encapsulated exosomes has been found to facilitate BMSCs migration and inflation, stimulate BMSCs proliferation and differentiation, and enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs-exosomes (43). In animal models of cartilage damage, the hydrogel sponges render MSCs-exosomes more stable
Some research has shown that using special nanoparticles to improve the exosomes biological characteristics could be beneficial. Although this strategy was not utilized in the treatment of OA or cartilage injury. The nanoparticles can prevent the release of exosomes. The mechanism by which these nanoparticles can prevent the exosomes from releasing is related to the silencing of genes. Researchers found that exposure to silica nanoparticles can decrease the exosomes secretion. According to a study conducted by Khongkow et al. (44), the ability of nanoparticles to enhance exosomes targeting ability was improved by using a mechanical method or by exosomes derived from healthy human cells. It is advantageous to improve the drug loading capacity of exosomes in order to broaden the spectrum of medication selection and locate the optimal medicine for OA treatment/cartilage repair.
Exosomes have been found to play a crucial role in maintaining chondrocyte density, promoting cell proliferation and differentiation, and inhibiting excessive chondrocyte death. In a surgically induced rat model of knee OA, intraarticular injection of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (BMSC-EXOs) was shown to alleviate cartilage injury and modulate subchondral bone remodelling (45).
Chondrocytes that dwell in an ECM mesh that constitute cartilage. The ECM is composed primarily of the network COL II and an interlocking mesh of fibrous proteins and PGs, HA, and chondroitin sulfate (CS). When chondrocytes and ECM are in a healthy state, they work together to sustain a balance between synthesis and degradation. In pathological conditions such as OA, there is an increase in ECM degradation, resulting in decreased collagen and proteoglycan levels. Exosomes have been shown to reduce cartilage damage and ECM degradation by increasing COL II expression and decreasing ADAMTS5 expression in a rat model of OA (48). Similarly, BMSC-EXOs also showed promise in promoting the expression of COL II and aggrecan while inhibiting catabolic enzymes and protecting chondrocytes from apoptosis. Exosomal miR-125a-5p and miR-136-5p were found to attenuate ECM degradation by targeting E2F2 and ELF3, respectively, in a mouse model of traumatic OA (49). Exosomes diminish the activity of inflammatory mediators, which is the requisite for treating inflammation, and aid in the conservancy of cartilage without its disintegration. The use of exosomes along with biomaterials is a promising area of research that holds great potential for the development of novel therapeutic approaches for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Exosomes have been found to promote angiogenesis in OA by stimulating the growth of new blood vessels known as neovascularization, considered to contribute to the progression of the disease by alleviating the supply of oxygen and nutrients to the affected joint. Exosomes can promote neovascularization by liberating pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor. Recent research has provided updated insights on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of OA using exosomes derived from annular fibrous cells reduced angiogenesis in intravertebral disc degeneration by downregulating VEGF (50).
In addition to promoting angiogenesis, exosomes also play a role in the development of fibrosis in OA. Fibrosis is the accumulation of scar tissue in the joint, which can contribute to cartilage loss and joint dysfunction. Exosomes can cause fibrosis by stimulating fibroblasts, the cells responsible for the production of collagen and other ECM components, that in turn mediated by the release of TGF-β and other pro-fibrotic factors. The lack of angiogenesis regulation in the pathogenesis of OA can potentially be addressed by establishing a feedback mechanism using exosomes, which could retard the disease progression. Whereas, the role of angiogenesis in the progression of OA is in dispute, and further exploration on angiogenesis-based treatments should be interpreted carefully. Additionally, the debate on whether cartilage repair can be promoted without exacerbating inflammation and pain still underway. The regulation of angiogenesis by exosomes presents area of concern, as the underlying mechanisms are still not well understood. A comprehensive understanding of exosome-mediated angiogenesis in OA could lead to significant therapeutic advancements.
While current treatments for OA, such as HA and Platelet Rich Plasma therapy, have shown some benefits, they may not be effective enough for everyone. Exosomes, on the other hand, have emerged as a promising alternative for the treatment of OA. Exosomes have the ability to suppress catabolic factors and boost anti-inflammatory cytokines, making them a potential tool for the treatment of OA (Fig. 2). Fig. 2 discusses the clinical applications of exosomes. Exosomes have shown great potential for the treatment of various diseases, and many preclinical experiments have confirmed their advantages in the field of regenerative medicine. For instance, exosomes can be administered directly to the joint space through intra-articular injection. Studies has proven that direct introduction of exosomes to the joint decrease pain and inflammation and promote the tissue repair furthermore, exosomes can also be administered systemically, such as through intravenous injection (51). Specifically, systemic administration of exosomes may provide a broader distribution of the therapy and decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, apoptotic proteins and TLR4/NF-κB signalling (52). Exosomes can also be utilized in combination with other therapies, such as platelet-rich plasma or HA injections. Combination therapy, which involves the use of two or more therapeutic agents, has been shown to be more effective than individual therapies alone. This approach can lead to additive or synergistic effects, enhancing the therapeutic effects of each individual therapy. Nonetheless, exosomes derived from ADSCs have become a hot topic in the field of personalized medicine, and their potential applications in various fields are being explored (53). This approach may reduce the risk of immune rejection and improve treatment efficacy.
Clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exosome therapy in OA. The clinical trials of Exosomes for Malignant and Acute Conditions conducted to date are listed in the (Table 3). If these trials demonstrate positive results, exosome therapy may become a viable treatment option for patients with OA and other conditions.
Table 3 . Clinical trials of exosomes for malignant and acute conditions
Disease | Clinical trial ID | Study title | Phase | No. of patients | Study type | Source of MSC | Route of administration | Dose |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OA | NCT05060107 | Intra-articular injection of MSC-derived exosomes in knee OA | 1 | 10 | Open label | N/A | IA | Single dose (3∼5×1011 particles/dose) |
Macular degeneration | NCT03437759 | MSC-Exos promote healing of MHs | 1 | N/A | Randomized | Umbilical cord tissue | Local | 50 or 20 μg MSC-Exos |
Type I diabetes mellitus | NCT02138331 | Effect of microvesicles and exosomes therapy onβ-cell mass in type I diabetesmellitus (T1D) | 02-Mar | N/A | Interventional open-label | Umbilical cord blood | IV | Two doses (one week apart) of exosomes produced from 1.22∼1.51×106 MSCs/kg |
Ischemic stroke | NCT03384433 | Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome inpatients with acute ischemic stroke | 01-Feb | 5 | Randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled | Bone marrow | Intraparenchymal | Single dose of (200 mg MSC-Exos) |
Dry eye | NCT04213248 | Effect of UC-MSC-Exos on dry eye in patients With cGVHD | 01-Feb | 27 | Single group | Umbilical cord | Artificial tears | UC-MSC-Exos 10 μg/drop, 4 times a day for 14 days |
Alzheimer’s disease | NCT04388982 | The safety and the efficacy evaluation of allogeneic adipose MSC-Exos in patients with Alzheimer’s disease | 01-Feb | 9 | Non-randomized | Adipose tissue | Nasal drip | 5/10/20 μg ASC-Exos weekly twice |
ARDS | NCT04602104 | A clinicalstudy of mesenchymal stem cell exosomes nebulizer for the treatment of ARDS | 01-Feb | 169 | Randomized, double-blinded, controlled | N/A | Inhalation | 2.0×108 exosomes, 8.0×108 vesicles, 16.0×108 exosomes (every day in a week) |
Pulmonary infection | NCT04544215 | A clinical study of mesenchymal progenitor cell exosomes nebulizer for the treatment of pulmonary infection | 01-Feb | 60 | Randomized, double-blinded, controlled | Adipose tissue | Inhalation | 8.0×108 exosomes/3 ml, 16.0×108 exosomes/3 ml (every day in a week) |
Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa | NCT04173650 | MSC-EVs in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa | N/A | 10 | Single group | Bone marrow | Local | N/A |
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome | NCT04356300 | Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome after surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection | N/A | 60 | Interventional | N/A | IV | 150 mg once a day (14 times) |
Periodontitis | NCT04270006 | Evaluation of adipose derived stem cells exo in treatment of periodontitis (exosomes) | 1 | 10 | Open label | Adipose tissue | Local | N/A |
Metastatic pancreas cancer | NCT03608631 | iExosomes in treating participants with metastatic pancreas cancer with KrasG12D mutation | 1 | 28 | Open label | N/A | IV | N/A |
COVID-19 | NCT04276987 | A pilot clinical study on inhalation of mesenchymal stem cells exosomes treating severe novel coronavirus pneumonia | 1 | 24 | Pilot/open-label | Adipose tissue | Inhalation | 5 times of MSC-Exos (2×108 nanovesicles/ 3 ml at Day 1∼5) |
SARS-CoV-2 | NCT04491240 | SARS-CoV-2 associated pneumonia | 1 | 30 | Interventional | N/A | Inhalation | Twice a day for 10 days inhalation of 3 ml (0.5∼2×1010 of nanoparticles) |
Normal and colon cancer tissue | NCT01294072 | Phase I clinical trial investigating the ability of plant exosomes to deliver curcumin to normal and malignant colon tissue | 1 | 35 | Interventional | Plant (grape) | Curcumin cargo | Curcumin combined with plant exosomes (every day in a week) |
MSC: mesenchymal stem cell, ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome, COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019, SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, OA: osteoarthritis, N/A: not available, IA: intraarticular, MSC-Exos: MSC-derived exosomes, MHs: medication history, IV: intravenous, UC: ulcerative colitis, cGVHD: chronic graft-versus-host disease, ASC: adipose stem cell, EVs: extracellular vesicles.
Exosomes have the potential to regenerate damaged cartilage. In this review, we have summarized current research on therapies for cartilage regeneration, with a focus on OA. We have highlighted studies that investigate various cell-derived exosomes. Multiple
OA further. Moreover, the long-term safety of exosome therapy in OA remains unknown, necessitating comprehensive studies to evaluate potential side effects. Animal model studies should also extend their observation time points to provide a more accurate reference for the application of exosomes in treating OA. Exosome therapy for OA is currently considered an experimental treatment and has not yet received regulatory approval from agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Regulatory approval is essential to ensure the safety and efficacy of this therapy. Considering that exosomes have a short half-life in the circulatory system, utilizing a hydrogel scaffold can be a suitable alternative for targeted delivery of exosomes. However, hydrogel delivery faces limitations such as non-effective crosslinking, the use of strong organic solvents for degradation, and exosome adhesion issues due to the absence of an ECM-like environment. Utilizing 3D bioprinting technology can help create more suitable culture conditions for exosomes and improve scaffolding for their delivery.
In conclusion, exosomes play a vital role in intercellular communication and contribute to the regeneration of cartilage-associated defects, particularly in OA. Extensive research has been conducted on the potential therapeutic targets of exosomes in treating chondral defects and OA. However, the optimization of exosomes is necessary to advance their therapeutic applications. Before exosomes can be effectively used in clinical practice, several challenges still need to be addressed. Although studies on the roles, properties, and applications of exosomes are in their early stages, recent research has shown promising results in utilizing exosomes for cartilage repair and regeneration. Tissue engineering techniques, such as hydrogels and scaffolds, have been employed to enhance the localization of exosomes for targeted drug delivery to specific cartilage defects. The combination of exosomes and hydrogels has demonstrated potential in stimulating chondrocyte proliferation and migration, reducing inflammation-induced apoptosis, as well as balancing the formation and degradation of cartilage matrix. With further research aimed at optimizing their therapeutic potential, exosome-based therapies for chondriodefect regeneration are expected to gain prominence in the near future.
There is no potential conflict of interest to declare.
Conceptualization: JS, SCL, JKS. Data curation: JS. Formal analysis: JS. Funding acquisition: JKS. Methodology: JS. Project administration: JKS. Supervision: SCL, HKK, JKS, JYK. Visualization: SSK. Writing – original draft: JS. Writing – review and editing: JS.
This work was supported by the Korea Fund for Rege-nerative Medicine (KFRM) grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Health & Welfare) (22C0603L1-11).
CrossRef (3) |